Darwin - On the Origin of Species II

"Darwin had a great imagination, but with no scientific evidence to support it, its just a fable. I can't believe people are so gullible as to believe the things written in here. I'm judging it as a work of fiction."

DIDN'T READ THE BOOK HUH


"Yes, I just marked it as read so I could put it on my 'needs-to-be-burned' shelf."

DIDN'T READ THE BOOK HUH


"I love putting this book under 'fiction.'"

DIDN'T READ THE BOOK HUH


"The true title that Darwin gave this thesis is: 'On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.' Amazon.com makes no mention of this. Darwin believed that the peoples of Africa were inferior."

DIDN'T READ THE BOOK HUH


"this book has contributed to the worst atrocities of the twentieth century, from the Jewish holocaust to the evils of Josef Stalin. The concept of 'survival of the fittest' and the idea that all existence is a mere accident, has also spawned many deranged and oddball fantasy/philosophies ... But now, with the complexity and beauty of even the simplest life forms, (one bacterium contains enough DNA information to fill a public library)the scientific validity of this book can be safely called into question. Darwinian ideals have badly shaken our civilization, directly or indirectly resulting in two world wars and the slaughter of millions. this book, although important, should be nonetheless relegated to the back shelves to gather dust, as should the beliefs and suppositions it contains."

DIDN'T READ THE BOOK HUH


"Here is an interesting experiment: Empty your garage of every piece of metal, wood, paint, rubber, and plastic. Make sure there is nothing there. Nothing. Then wait for ten years and see if a Mercedes evolves. If it doesn't appear, leave it for 20 years. If that doesn't work, try it for 100 years. Then try leaving it for 10,000 years."

DIDN'T READ THE BOOK HUH


"Darwin says that if we find out that the cell is not simple, then his whole theory is destroyed."

DIDN'T READ THE BOOK HUH


"I find it interesting because he doesn't actually support macro-evolution, like an amoeba becoming a fish which becomes a frog. But rather in micro-evolution, like a fish growing an extra fin which helps it swim faster to escape predators."

DIDN'T READ THE BOOK HUH


"In order to prove the theory proposed, he requires future findings of fossils that, to this day, haven't been found yet. 1/5 Stars for Charlie."

DIDN'T READ THE BOOK HUH


"It's like 1/10 theory and 9/10 observational evidence for the theory. Since I buy it, I don't need all that evidence."

IDIOT HUH


"The animals are de - evolving. Less DNA being accessed due to different threats and food sources for each animal group. Animals are changing because they are outside of the collective. Not from live that we can see with the naked eye, other animals why some are not afraid of other animals, but from microscopic organisms; bacteria and viruses (lack of exposure) on islands. Darwin was not aware of these. Survival of the sickest ( in isolation). Traits (mutations) 'tells' who is healthiest in the isolate group to be the 'healthiest' strongest against the next mutation insects in the environment. Life structures we can'tsee influences the design of the shape of the life we do see."

HARD NIGHT ON THE P HUH